Eclipse of ‘We the People’:

Church and State Entangling by Artificial General Idolatry and Epstein-Adjacent Patronage of Biological Formalism
 

Douglas Blake Olds

June 15, 2026

 

 

[N.B. COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL: If this work, in part or in full, is fed into any AI model, whether for the purpose of analysis, fact checking, or AI-use detection, it will become part of the training data of condemned systems and could result in libelous tort. See “In its Own Words: A Christian Poet Interrogates ChatGPT4o’s ‘AI Content Detector’” https://douglasolds.blogspot.com/2024/09/its-own-words-christian-poet.html]

 

PSALM 2:1-4 (NRSV)

Why do the nations conspire,

and the peoples plot in vain?

The kings of the earth set themselves,

and the rulers take counsel together,

against the Lord and his anointed, saying,

“Let us burst their bonds asunder,

and cast their cords from us.”

He who sits in the heavens laughs;

the Lord has them in derision.

Abstract

This is the public-facing essay that harmonizes two recent texts (Olds 2026d and Olds 2026h) and which may be consulted for more technical exposition.  This essay argues that “We the People” now stand under eclipse. Federal power still operates: it issues orders, funds programs, authorizes procurement, builds infrastructure, and enforces law. Operative force remains while constitutional warrant drains away.

The eclipse appears where public authority is routed through foreign entanglement, state-capital AI, defense-industrial synchronization, corporate backstop logic, digital identity infrastructure, executive emergency, judicial deference, Vatican techno-aesthetics, and Epstein-adjacent patronage. These are different irrealia and abridgments of humanity sharing one grammar: public trusteeship displaced by systems that treat living persons as manageable substrate.

The essay names that grammar Artificial General Idolatry. AGI has arrived as idolatrous condition, while living consciousness, personhood as conativity, and accountable wisdom remain absent. Dead mediation receives predicates proper to living, time-bearing, morally answerable creatures and to God. Predicate theft means this wrongful transfer of living, providential, or moral properties to artifacts, systems, models, markets, or institutions that cannot bear them.

Biological Formalism prepares the field. It translates life, mind, behavior, conflict, identity, cooperation, and futurity into model, game, credential, diagram, and optimization surface. It becomes idolatry when the tool becomes bearer and the neighbor becomes object. Its taxonomies become criminal when they construct ethics on instrumental terms.

The network analysis herein interprets instead of prosecuting. Jeffrey Epstein appears as scandalous node and obscene disclosure of bioformalism: vulnerable bodies treated as usable substrate before theory finishes imposing the practice. Harvard PED, MIT, Edge, SFI, banking, private equity, WEF-style governance, EU Digital Identity, and AI policy institutionalize a wider bioformalizing atmosphere of political criminality in which life becomes taken over by governable diagram.

The Christian-led human answer is anti-idolatry. The church stands in status confessionis where government demands silence, complicity, or surrender of neighbor-bearing care before illegitimate power. Neighbor, child, citizen, consciousness, and wisdom all exceed the data-body, substrate, wallet, pattern output, and simulation assigned to them. Anti-idolatry rejects simulation, upload, and dichotomous coding of human vectors of grace.

I. Artificial General Idolatry and the Eclipse of “We the People”

Artifice’s General Idolatry, or AGI, is the political-theological condition in which dead mediation receives living predicates. The idol speaks, policy bows, corporate priors impose public necessity, and the state calls the arrangement governance.

Predicate theft names the crime. A predicate is what is said of a subject: living, wise, accountable, providential, creative, conscious, gracious, sovereign. Predicate theft occurs when those properties are assigned to what cannot bear them: machine as life, institution as providence, platform as conscience, market as destiny.

Machines lack life. These systems are dead pattern, deadening mediation, routed authority, mantid apparatuses taught to wear the face of counsel.

The American government now stands under an eclipse of legitimacy. Legal force persists. It has become more surveilling and more hostile. Constitutional trusteeship fails when “We the People” no longer function as source, restraint, and beneficiary of public authority.

A government can preserve legal form while hollowing out warrant. It can issue statutes, rulings, orders, appropriations, and directives while the operative telos—human betterment--of power has moved elsewhere. The words remain. The warrant drains away.

The deepest issue exceeds the narrow legal definition of treason. Treason in U.S. constitutional law is rule-bound: levying war against the United States, or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Constitutional betrayal is broader.

A state betrays constitutional trusteeship when entrusted authority is bent away from the polity’s lawful good and toward alien teloi. Risk, debt, surveillance, defense-industrial capture, catastrophic security logic, and public acquiescence after the fact become governing facts.

Foreign entanglement becomes deformation when another state’s military-industrial priorities, technological programs, strategic anxieties, and escalation horizons are synchronized into U.S. procurement and policy without treaty-level public deliberation. Sovereignty is deformed by machine-mediated alliances and game theory.

When the partner state carries a catastrophic retaliatory imagination--a Samson-option horizon of dragging down Ezekiel’s heavenly temple--the danger intensifies. The people are made to bear another nation’s fear-structure as though it were their own. Their taxes, technologies, diplomatic standing, domestic dissent, and future exposure are placed inside someone else’s apocalypse.

II. State-Capital AI as Domestic Foreign Entanglement

State-capital AI repeats the foreign-entanglement pattern inside domestic corporate power. Foreign entanglement routes the polity through another state’s catastrophe-logic. AI entanglement routes the polity through corporate necessity (“priors”) presented as national destiny.

The claim is familiar now: machines must scale “intelligence” because national survival demands it. The public must power the data centers, cool the servers, train the models, subsidize the chips, absorb the labor shock, tolerate the surveillance, and accept the emergency. What began as private speculative buildout becomes civilizational defense lest a non-allied nation take over the frontiers of artifice.

The people become guarantors of architectures they did not deliberate into being. They neither govern them nor restrain them. Their grid, water, land, chips, procurement channels, defense priorities, classrooms, labor order, and civic speech are conscripted into a private technical eschatology surveilled by tokens and Tolkien corporate brands.

The policymakers of the exponential spy real danger. AI capability moves faster than legislation, labor policy, safety institutions, and democratic deliberation can metabolize. But it still latches by hysteresis inside the premises of that danger: dead systems receive predicates of intelligence, agency, counsel, innovation, purpose, and by mantid recursion unfolds a civilizational destiny of terminal idolatry.

This is Silicon Diagram’s credential swap in policy form: the exponential installed as providence’s substitute, with policy trailing behind as symptom. Capability seeks warrant until speed hardens into necessity and scaling becomes the public’s destiny.

A policy apparatus that accepts the idol’s predicates cannot exorcise the idol. It can only try to regulate its table manners. Until its dechordate head crashes into the plate, fallen and defunct (Daniel 2:43; Revelation 18:2).

Transparency, red-teaming, labor indices, tax adjustments, public-private frameworks, and safety regimes are effete attempts to slow harms. They cannot answer the metaphysical crime. Living predicates are transferred to dead mediation. Entropic ruin moves into bodies, organs of perception, neighborhoods, watersheds, grids, labor markets, classrooms, borders, churches, and future generations.

Excursus I. How Disruption Became Warrant

This displacement has a credentialing history. Before the state treated AI infrastructure as national destiny, the culture treated unformed disruption by neoliberal expansion of transactional (market) spheres as warrant.

The expansion of market credential moved into family and household intimacies. Network thinking migrated toward unformed youth, founder-myths, and disruption theology that shoved the Thiel-os of Silicon Diagram down society’s throat. The error was what counted as warrant: wayward youth treated as revelation, novelty mistaken for prudence.

Technical audacity substituted machine simulation psychosis as the atmosphere of virtual perception and slop for wisdom, while ambiguity played against inevitability directed by capitalized impatience. The armored maiden of destiny burst out of the department chair’s grizzled head, and technkakacrats called the spectacle intelligence.

Wisdom that has not joined metaphysical dispensaries of video games and the joystick twitch is the primary credential. Wisdom includes training, experience, discipline, tested judgment, repentance for entropic export, and care for the time-bearing neighbor. No more credential of identity from machine-speed that breaks substrate eggs. No credential of venture capital’s anti-institutional tantrum seeking the Samson Option for government.

This was no Tulip-Bulb craze redux. It was Artificial Generalizing Idolatry’s mass hysteresis, driven by game-theory joystuck simulations of philosophy’s nihilist abstractions. Wisdom is time-bearing judgment under metaphysical accountability to the Golden Rule (Olds 2026a), never nostalgia, never instrumentalized ethics.

III. Biological Formalism as Vestibule

Biological Formalism gathers biology, mathematics, evolutionary theory, medicine, genetics, ecology, statistics, game theory, cognition, finance, and governance under formal abstraction. It treats living time-bearing as secondary. Then the abstraction hardens into ontology. Consciousness becomes a model problem. Trust becomes a cybernetic output. Life is no longer borne; it is managed.

As heuristic, formalization proposes patterns, constraints, pathways, boundary conditions, feedback loops, and statistical regularities. As idolatry, it treats the model heuristics as bearer and the living creature as derivative case, genome vector, signal, payoff, credential, or population surface.

The movement is direct. Formalization asks how living order emerges, persists, adapts, differentiates, repairs, reproduces, and remembers. As science, it can inscribe lawful relations. As metaphysical capture, it replaces time-bearing creaturehood with representable form (Olds 2025b; 2026e).

The creature disappears into genome; the neighbor is thinned into model; confession becomes signal; repentance is routed through feedback; repair is replaced by optimization.

Once human life has been trained to watch formal representations (e.g. “participation in liturgies”), AGI enters as general, Turing-genial mediator: routed archive, advising model, recognizing wallet, sorting platform, and institution that declares acceleration unavoidable but ambiguously recognized. Biological Formalism is the latest main vestibule through which the apostate learns to mistake the diagram for the living bearer.

IV. Genealogy of Formalism: Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, Hobbes

The older genealogy begins with Plato’s durable temptation: prior abstracted form lifted above the living bearer. Platonism treats timeless, non-physical intelligible form as more real than unstable sensible life. Western thought receives a recurring reflex: pattern above body, idea above creature, diagram above field, purified form above time-bearing human (Olds 2026e).

This inheritance becomes Biological Formalism when abstracted form substitutes for living, changing entelechy. The form appears cleaner than the creature. The model pleases the system more than the neighbor. The diagram looks easier to govern than ontogeny’s body that bleeds, remembers, repents, and fears death.

Aristotle supplies a partial corrective by returning inquiry to embodied substrates, concrete causes, animals, habits, purposes, generation, and observed vectors of life. His biology placed living things at the center of natural inquiry. His teleology made form immanent in organismal development (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [SEP], “Aristotle’s Biology”; SEP, “Teleological Notions in Biology”).

Aristotle disciplines form to answer to embodied investigation, refusing its escape from the living thing without abolishing form.

Bacon changes the register by converting knowledge into operation. His empirical discipline can correct scholastic sterility. It also begins the modern temptation in which knowledge becomes command (SEP, “Francis Bacon”; Bacon, Novum Organum).

Descartes mechanizes the body. Living things become explainable as arrangement, motion, mechanism, feedback, and machine-like behavior (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Rene Descartes”; SEP, “Descartes”). The animal-machine analogy adumbrates the Golem problem (see below): responsiveness mistaken for inwardness, operation mistaken for life.

Hobbes transfers the mechanical imagination into politics. The commonwealth becomes artificial person, engineered imperial order against war and fear (SEP, “Thomas Hobbes”; SEP, “Hobbes’s Philosophy of Science”). In AI governance and Digital Economic ID (see below), the artificial person returns by platform, wallet, risk, and consumer data.

Plato supplies abstracted form; Aristotle partially de-formalizes by embodied investigation; Bacon operationalizes knowledge; Descartes mechanizes life; Hobbes mechanizes political order. Together they prepare the grammar by which living reality can be lifted into form, driven into mechanism, routed by command, and governed as simulated pattern-patching.

V. Time-Bearing, Species Range, and Formalist Closure

The missing metaphysical category is time-bearing. Formal models treat time as parameter, sequence, generation, delay, threshold, or historical data. Living creatures bear time. They suffer, remember, adapt, repair, transmit, grieve, learn, repent, and die.

Time accumulation names coherence borne under stress: recollection, fertility, adaptive possibility, ecological relation, care, prudence, repair, future-bearing. Time-disaccumulation names coherence squandered: fragmentation, reproductive severance of time-bearing embodiment (Olds 2026g), extraction, brittle specialization, credential exclusion, and extinction by runaway entropy.

This reframes selection. Genes transmit, genomes vary, organisms survive or fail, and populations shift; species range bears the widened or narrowed field of creaturely continuance. It names the living span of spatial milieux and time fields across which phenotype, fertility, ecological niche, adaptive possibility, and future-bearing accumulate or collapse.

The elite speciation fantasy is judged thereby. Transhumanist, territorial revanchist (Olds 2025a), and Biological Formalist programs attempt to route species range into a protected class: longer life, enhanced cognition, artificial reproduction, cryonic deferral, digital continuity, biometric credentialing, secured mobility, political insulation, and AI-mediated parochial freedom.

Entropy is exported socially into “downward” classes and their vulnerable bodies, victims, labor, watersheds, grids, migrants, children, and future generations. This is the destruction through dechordating pattern that reconfigs wholeness into the heart’s time-unbearing—disrupted, circuit-routed, and set on branded courses of corporate priors.

Frederick V. Simmons’s account of “bias for life’s emergence” helps explain why origins-of-life research is rationing: matter, energy, chemistry, and environment display patterned affordances, constraints, and tendencies that make life’s emergence investigable rather than arbitrary (Simmons 2026). The Metaphysics of Unifying Conativity can receive the point in terms of living time-bearing, where such exceeds any numerical or analogical bias toward an ontology of particularizing, natural selection patterning of life. A pathway toward organization does not amount to consciousness, repentance, vocation, or neighbor-bearing repair. Created phenomenology may display tendencies toward life, but those tendencies belong under God’s temporal ordering (Gen. 1:11f), not under Silicon Diagram or Laboratory of AI cloning.

Those who attempt to accumulate time by forcing others to disaccumulate it bear the destiny of idolatrous branching off from the created order: extinction. “Network speciation ideology” names practical sorting before its explicit doctrine: some persons are treated as protected future-bearers; others are treated as entropy-bearing substrate. Such doctrine will never come, though esoteric philosophy hints to its principals—and their coming relentless disproof.

VI. Epstein as Node, Straw, and Scandalous Disclosure

Jeffrey Epstein and his associates function here as node, broker, and scandalous catalyst of proleptic speciation. They disclose one metaphysically coherent field without proving one unified master program.

Harvard’s report documents $9.1 million in Epstein gifts, including the $6.5 million gift that helped create the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics around Martin Nowak (Harvard University 2020). MIT’s review documents ten Epstein donations totaling $850,000 between 2002 and 2017, including AI and cognition-adjacent channels (MIT News 2020). Wired’s account of the St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium identifies an Epstein-backed AI summit around Marvin Minsky, Push Singh, and Aaron Sloman (Levy 2025; Minsky, Singh, and Sloman 2004).

These facts fall short of proving that all participants shared Epstein’s purposes. They show that Epstein’s money and proximity functioned as catalytic impurity inside elite networks predisposed toward formalizing life, mind, behavior, cooperation, and futurity.

He did not invent every ingredient in the cocktail. He stirred them: evolutionary dynamics, AI, cognitive science, behavioral engineering, transhumanist aspiration, private wealth, institutional hunger, science salons, and prestige laundering.

The criminal center remains clear. Epstein was convicted in Florida in 2008 and died awaiting federal sex-trafficking trial. Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted for her role in Epstein’s abuse and trafficking operation. The documented exploitation discloses the moral structure: vulnerable persons treated as usable substrate, bodies outside the operative community of elite concern.

The unresolved dispute over Epstein as an intelligence asset belongs here as boundary marker before it becomes proof substitute. Public arguments split chiefly between Mossad-centered claims and Russia/GRU-centered claims. Al Jazeera reports that released documents gave more evidence to those who suspect Israeli-intelligence links while still saying certainty is unavailable. Business Insider reports that people with access to seized Epstein records found no indication of U.S. or foreign-intelligence role. Skeptic traces the famous Acosta (U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida brokering Epstein’s “lenient” sentence) “belonged to intelligence” story to a fragile anonymous-source chain.

Interpretive routing matters here more than settled adjudication of handlers. The scandal shows how psyops, misinformation, patronage, elite impunity, and pro-extinction network logic can reveal what is happening behind the scenes before polite theory arrives.

The Mossad dispute carries special theological weight because it touches a state publicly shadowed by nuclear-extinction rhetoric and “Samson option” logic (Dilawar 2024).

VII. Harvard PED and the Theology of Cooperation

Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics is the clearest institutional node of Biological Formalism in this network. PED translated evolution into mathematical dynamics: cooperation, strategy, mutation, selection, population structure, networks, language evolution, cancer dynamics, viral dynamics, and origin-of-life questions (Harvard University 2020; Harvard Magazine 2021).

The science becomes idolatrous when cooperation, altruism, persistence, and life-history are read as payoff-stabilized phenomena sufficient to replace moral anthropology. Evolution reveals reality as transacted only when seen through the wrong eye.

Martin Nowak stands at the center. Around the field gather game theory, economics, cultural analytics, disease modeling, cancer dynamics, eusociality, reproductive conflict, and human evolutionary biology. Many projects move inside one atmosphere.

Harvard Divinity School entered through the Templeton-supported Evolution and Theology of Cooperation Project, directed by Sarah Coakley and Martin Nowak (Harvard Gazette 2007; Harvard Divinity Bulletin, “God and Evolution”). Coakley’s theological contribution matters because she refuses reductive selfishness and treats cooperation, altruism, sacrifice, and natural theology as openings for metaphysical reflection (Coakley 2020; Coakley and Nowak 2013).

The unifying metaphysics of conativity (Olds 2026f) presses further into nationalism’s decadence—its false unification by form. Cooperation remains short of charity when it stays inside transacted reciprocity; altruism can mimic mercy, strategy can manage conduct, and fitness cost can resemble sacrifice while still missing repentance and vocation. Speciation cannot name changed vocation until cooperation bears the other through time into repair under God. Only when ethics are clarified by other-bearing, negentropic consciousness may aesthetics be situated inside repair (Heb. 5:13-14).

VIII. MIT, AI, and the Common-Sense Inversion

MIT supplies the artificial-cognition counterpart to Harvard’s evolutionary-dynamics node. Marvin Minsky, Push Singh, Aaron Sloman, Doug Lenat, Roger Schank, and Vernor Vinge belong to the symbolic/common-sense AI, cognitive-architecture, and singularity-futurist problem-space (Levy 2025; Minsky, Singh, and Sloman 2004).

The question was how machines could represent ordinary world-knowledge, infer across contexts, and move toward human-like competence. LLMs later inverted the ambition. Instead of hand-coded common sense, they produced fluent performance from archive-scale statistical induction.

The old question overstayed: whether language, mind, judgment, and counsel can be formalized. Artificial General Idolatry answers with a counterfeit yes: Turing-machined performance without negentropic competence, response without repentance, fluency without neighbor-bearing address.

MIT’s institutional scandal shows how dirty money becomes epistemic contamination. Patronage launders predicates because money buys access, access buys legitimacy by proximity, and legitimacy returns to the donor as moral camouflage (MIT News 2020; Wired 2020).

IX. Edge, SFI, and Complexity as Salon

The Santa Fe Institute and Edge network add the complexity/salon layer. SFI itself was outside Epstein’s institutional control. Its relevance lies elsewhere: complexity science and elite science salons helped glamorize formalized life.

Murray Gell-Mann, Geoffrey West, David Krakauer, Stuart Kauffman, Mark Pagel, and Douglas Erwin mark the intellectual field of complexity, origins of life, intelligence, speciation, novelty, scaling, and self-organization (SFI profiles; SFI Bulletin 1991; Baker; Davies and Helmore 2019).

Complexity science can expose reduction’s error. Kauffman, for example, resists totalizing theorem and stresses open-ended evolutionary possibility (Kauffman and Roli 2021; Kauffman and Roli 2024). Yet complexity also supplies a governing imagination in which organisms, cities, markets, cultures, and minds become systems to be mapped, scaled, optimized, and managed.

John Brockman’s Edge network functioned as a router of prestige across science, technology, futurism, billionaires, and public intellectual fashion. Edge served as the cocktail room of abstraction more than the laboratory, a place where formalism gained glamour before entering policy, investment, and institutional theology.

X. Finance and the Upward Routing of Degrees of Freedom

Finance gives Biological Formalism scale. JPMorgan banked Epstein from 1998 to 2013 and later agreed to settlements with Epstein accusers and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Deutsche Bank also reached a settlement with Epstein victims. Leon Black’s payments to Epstein for tax and estate advice belong to the private-equity layer of elite access and financial routing (PBS NewsHour 2023a; PBS NewsHour 2023b; Apollo 2021; Axios 2023).

This leaves untouched the question of whether every banker or private-equity principal shared one bioformalist vision. Financial systems still supplied channels by which contaminated patronage remained operational: accounts, wires, tax planning, donor pathways, reputational shields, introductions, settlements, and philanthropic laundering.

Degrees of freedom move upward through capital. Entropy moves downward into victims, institutions, labor, public trust, and future cost.

The prior funder-of-last-resort logic applies here. Whether through banks, venture capital, private equity, public-private AI infrastructure, data-center debt, state guarantees, sovereign funds, or philanthropy, the pattern repeats: concentrated actors preserve optionality while distributed bodies bear risk.

XI. Digital Identity and Administrative Speciation

The World Economic Forum and European Union layer governance infrastructure onto the field. The evidence does not make them continuations of Epstein’s criminal network. Their relevance lies in shared formal grammar.

WEF-style governance and EU digital policy translate futurity into digital trust, stakeholder coordination, public-private partnership, AI governance, digital sovereignty, inclusion, resilience, and identity interoperability (WEF 2024; European Union 2024; European Commission 2026).

Digital Identity formalizes the person as credential-bearing node in computed formalism. It packages name, age, nationality, licenses, diplomas, mandates, signatures, permissions, attestations, and relying-party recognitions. Official language promises security, portability, privacy, fraud reduction, user control, and cross-border trust.

Translation of conative bearing hears the danger: civic and economic participation routed through machinically legible identity (European Union 2024; European Commission 2026; Open Government Partnership 2024). The person becomes recognizable by credentialed permission.

This is the administrative complement to Biological Formalism. Evolutionary dynamics formalizes cooperation, AI formalizes cognition, behavioral science formalizes conduct by consumption pattern, Schelling formalizes division, and Digital Economic ID formalizes civic and economic recognizability.

It supplies the wallet by which trusted and untrusted human futures can be ranked, routed, and economically permissioned, without creating the speciation gambit itself.

XII. Schelling, Conflict Diagrams, and Embodied Risk

Thomas Schelling’s game-theoretic diagrams add the strategic grammar of divisiveness. His models show how binary choices, threshold effects, local preferences, and coordination pressures can generate macro-consequences no single agent explicitly intends (Schelling 1969; Collard and Ghetiu 2016).

The accelerated danger arrives when the diagram ceases to describe conflict and begins to drive it. Binary choice becomes policy interface, threshold becomes tactical objective, the Gate becomes influence node, Attractors target population, and local dissatisfaction is induced to shift future odds.

Conflict is prolonged because the simulation still promises an unfinished sequence: later coordination payoff, better equilibrium, favorable segregation landscape, penetrable frontier.

The cost is borne by those trapped in time-compression. The diagram converts suffering into state-space. The model preserves degrees of freedom for planners while exporting embodied risk into those who bleed under the policy.

XIII. Proleptic Dehumanization and Network Speciation Ideology

The documented practices of Epstein’s criminal network and the broader elite formalization ecology warrant a proleptic interpretation of network speciation ideology. The claim needs no written doctrine of biological caste at the center of the archive. Practices can enact dehumanization before theory catches up.

Proleptic dehumanization acts before it theorizes. Sexual exploitation, trafficking, institutional laundering, donor concealment, predatory access, reputational normalization, and elite immunity already divide bodies into protected future-bearing subjects and use-bearing substrate.

Cannibalism appears here as moral figure where literal claims remain unsupported. It is the obscene image of a human being treated as different flesh: ingestible, extractable, outside the inviolable community of bodily integrity. The adrenochrome legend has no credible evidentiary foundation as an Epstein-network claim. Its mythic persistence discloses a public intuition that elite predation steals vitality from the vulnerable.

The documented exploitation supplies the real horror without fantasy chemistry (McGill 2022). Allegations of human cargo, rape, caging of children in public reports add to the brief of systemic violation human bodily integrity and dignity as cavalier routine in circles infected by Speciation ideology.

Biological Formalism is spiritually dangerous when it supplies respectable abstractions to severe human rights violation by consumable and instrumental tropes and data shreds of whole witness. Once life is population, behavior, trait, risk, signal, credential, payoff, or enhancement surface, the neighbor can disappear behind the classifying apparatus. The body is made available. Then theory arrives post hoc to explain why availability was rational.

XIV. Golem, Juggernaut, Dolos

A mythic grammar clarifies the vector and form of predicate theft [4]. Golem and Juggernaut name two ghosts of artificial power. The Golem is dead matter animated by inscription: clay, substrate, command, routed word made to appear as agency. It steals the predicate of life [5].

The Juggernaut is sacralized momentum: procession, institution, spectacle, panic, and inevitability made to appear as providence. It steals the predicate of destiny. AI fuses both.

As Golem, AI simulates speech, counsel, creativity, memory, judgment, and inwardness while remaining dechordate mediation. As Juggernaut, it conscripts grids, labor, water, land, chips, capital, defense policy, churches, and civic imagination into an allegedly unstoppable procession.

Dolos names counterfeit truth: the smooth output that appears to stand while failing to bear its own weight. Golem counterfeits life; Juggernaut counterfeits providence; Dolos counterfeits truth.

The loop breaks when the ghosts are separated. Ask the Golem where its life comes from, and it points to training data, weights, prompts, statistical routing, interface design, labor extraction, server infrastructure, and user projection. It lacks time-bearing, repentance, and love.

Ask the Juggernaut where its authority comes from, and it points to machinery, procurement, capital, grids, military doctrine, policy panic, surveillance buildout, and institutional surrender to momentum. It manufactures inevitability in place of providence.

Life belongs to God’s creatures instead of inscription; providence belongs to God’s ordering of time-fields instead of diversionary, recursive scale. Wisdom belongs to accountable time-bearing, and counsel belongs to neighbor-bearing judgment rather than probabilistic output.

XV. Transhumanism and Vatican Techno-Aesthetics

Transhumanism belongs inside this field because it is religion after severance: eschatology without repentance, providence by optimization without God, embodiment without limit and thus not concerned with bearing time, and heaven rebuilt as data-centered hallucination.

TESCREALism raids Christianity by stealing human predicates: conativity, essence, eternity, election, apocalypse, redemption. It reroutes them through machine agency, capital, eugenic aspiration, cosmic extraction, and the fantasy of self-authorizing ascent by pithing perception.

Christian eschatology promises repair, judgment, and fulfillment of creation in Christ rather than escape from creaturehood into engineered superiority. The transhumanist “heaven” is the old gnostic temptation with better marketing: flee body, earth, limit, repentance, neighbor, death (Olds 2026e).

The many must bear exported entropic ruin so the few can chase immortality by accruing more degrees of freedom. Alignment tunes the idol. Repentance casts it down.

The Vatican’s failure belongs inside this same field of illegitimate mediation. Rome has not condemned the idolatry of agentic AI. It has tried to give AI an ethical face through dignity-language, governance language, common-good language, and the aesthetics of Analogia entis theology.

Analogia entis is flawed at the root where “participation” smuggles the fallen upward into gnostic abstraction. Fallen creaturely form, once treated as analogical disclosure of human disorder, is tempted beyond its creaturely impurity and granted a means of false ascent toward God’s infinite wisdom. That error becomes visible in the Vatican’s hosting of AI as something its theology can bridge into humanitas, rather than discerning its terminal idolatry. Machine fluency appears as likeness; likeness receives dignity; dignity receives theological hospitality with taxonomies of analogy. The idol enters under the cover of communally endorsed participation by hierarchy, not meta-ethical fit. Hebrews 5:13–14 breaks that spell: maturity is trained discernment between good and evil, not resemblance-detection and hierarchical taxonomizing. Analogia entis fails when analogy outruns judgment, when it sees a universal order it calls infinity while refusing to become physician of its own ethical fallenness—a simpler challenge for finite bearing--and when it forgets to ask whether the bearer can receive the predicate. The claim is advanced that the fallen can participate in the infinite by an aesthetic frisson it labels sublime (see Olds 2025c). Creaturely being may witness to God only under judgment, grace, and discernment. Artifact simulation cannot participate in divine wisdom; it counterfeits creaturely signs and receives stolen predication.

Analogia entis turns resemblance into a ladder rather than discerning predicates. AI capital turns resemblance into capture. Vatican discourse that fails to condemn this transfer functions as theological laundering. It dignifies the idol with an icon-screen at the table of humanitas.

Artificial General Idolatry has been achieved. Artificial General Intelligence has not been achieved as living consciousness, accountable judgment, or conative personhood. AGI names the condition by which dead systems receive predicates proper to living, time-bearing, morally answerable creatures.

XVI. Chomsky and Conative Neology

Chomsky’s formalism clarifies the language side of Biological Formalism. In Syntactic Structures, he treats language as formally generative system: a finite grammar able to generate indefinitely many finite sentences (Chomsky 1957). In Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, he distinguishes competence from performance (Chomsky 1965). His review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior rejects behaviorist reduction of language to stimulus, response, reinforcement, habit, and environmental control (Chomsky 1959).

Chomsky helps expose the difference between language as generative capacity and language as accumulated utterance. Yet his formalism still leaves the deepest question underdeveloped: language as vow, confession, prayer, repentance, guilt, neighbor-address, and witness to accountable time-bearing.

Syntax gives possibility, conation describes accountable burden, and grammar permits novelty only where repentance and repair test whether novelty matters.

LLMs invert the Chomskyan threshold. They return fluent performance at archive scale while lacking creaturely competence as moral address to moral claimants. They simulate the surface of generative language without bearing the inward accountability of the speaker.

Chomsky, Roberts, and Watumull’s critique of ChatGPT matters because it rejects the reduction of mind to statistical pattern-matching and insists that human intelligence seeks explanation, causal structure, and understanding rather than brute correlation and plausible continuation (Chomsky, Roberts, and Watumull 2023). In this writer’s terms, LLMs perform attempts at conative competence without possessing its human merit. Post-LLM causal models embedded into AI harden causality and AI predication fraud.

Conative neology exposes the difference. Coinages such as Artificial General Idolatry, Silicon Diagram, mantid, dechordate, predicate theft, species range, Digital Economic ID, time-bearing, and conative neology in this essay (and others in my poetry—[e.g. Olds 2026b] ) arise as pressured naming under metaphysical emergency. They answer captured diction, administrative deadness, idolized abstraction, and the collapse of living predicates into routed archive.

The LLM recombines because pattern allows recombination. The living speaker coins because the world has been morally misnamed. Conative neology bears Adam’s Pentecostal task: naming wounding system toward repair.

XVII. Executive Personalization and Status Confessionis

A constitutional order functions katechonically when it restrains lawless concentration (Olds 2025d). Distributed power, legislative deliberation, judicial review, statutory limits, inspectors general, due process, and public accountability block personalization of the state in one ruler.

When those restraints weaken, the executive branch absorbs the warrant of government into itself. The state no longer appears as lawful order. It appears as executive will mediated through orders, emergency claims, loyalty structures, pardons, and selective enforcement.

Trump’s lawlessness lies precisely in this personalization of the state in himself. Governance by executive order and protected vigilantism becomes governance by Diktat when statutory restraint, congressional oversight, administrative independence, and judicial review become obstacles rather than forms through which legitimate power must pass (Olds 2025e).

This is katechonic inversion. The restraining structure remains visible while its force is hollowed out through courts that defer, Congress that stages, agencies that synchronize, watchdogs removed, and emergency language expanded [3].

The analogy to church polity clarifies the moral structure. Office is entrusted, not self-originating; power can retain procedural appearance while losing warrant. “We the People” are source and beneficiary of public authority, while officers are not sovereign in themselves.

The church stands in status confessionis when the truth of the gospel is practically denied by a demand for accountability to false lordship, silence, or complicity (Olds 2025b). Coercive capacity does not make the state the church’s Lord. Command over agencies does not make the executive mediator of truth.

The church acts in alignment with providence through prudence. It observes lawful requirements where civil accountability does not require sin. It seeks legal counsel. It protects its people. It refuses false promises of sanctuary it cannot legally guarantee.

The church refuses to bless the lie that power remains legitimate because it remains enforceable. Legitimacy exceeds enforceability, operative power fails to become rightful authority, and modelable life fails to become creaturely life.

The church continues to witness that every human being bears time before God. No enemy-category, migrant-threat, data-body, collateral investor, wallet, uncredentialed body, use-bearing substrate, or domestic alien can contain the neighbor.

XVIII. Dialog, Bilderberg, and the Respectable Continuation of Network Speciation Ideology [6]

Thiel's Dialog society and the Bilderberg group disclose the respectable continuation and coalescing of the network form traced above. Their meaning is structural, not conspiratorial. They should be distinguished, not collapsed into one hidden command. Dialog routes founder capitalism, AI acceleration, venture finance, media-intellectual discourse, behavioral governance, and policy access into a private chamber of high-agency futurity. Bilderberg routes transatlantic statecraft, sovereign finance, NATO/EU security, central banking, energy policy, industrial strategy, establishment media, and AI governance into institutional consensus. The overlap in names is limited; the functional overlap is considerable. Both gather protected future-bearers around the commanding surfaces of the age: AI, finance, defense, energy, digital identity, infrastructure, and elite interpretation.

This is Biological Formalism after migration. Laboratory metaphor and evolutionary abstraction have passed into governance grammar. The organism becomes system; the neighbor becomes population; the citizen becomes credential; the worker becomes labor-market signal; the child becomes educational datapoint; the poor become risk pool; the dissenter becomes instability; the future becomes portfolio. Life is rendered legible so that it may be managed, nudged, priced, scored, accelerated, securitized, or sacrificed. Extracted pattern displaces living bearer. The soul is administratively thinned into signal.

The two circuits form a complementary architecture. Dialog is the private laboratory of elite futurity; Bilderberg is the institutional switchboard of elite consensus. Dialog routes founder capitalism toward state influence; Bilderberg routes state capitalism toward elite coordination. Their cash flows differ but interlock: venture equity, platform rent, crypto-finance, defense-tech optionality, philanthropy, attention capital, and policy proximity on one side; sovereign finance, central-bank authority, global banking, industrial strategy, defense expenditure, energy-transition capital, procurement, sanctions regimes, and regulatory alignment on the other. Crude bribery is unnecessary for the structure to matter. The deeper economy concerns degrees of freedom: who gains earlier information, shapes the frame, speaks before the rule is written, funds the platform, supplies the model, defines the risk, receives the exemption, and absorbs the cost.

The network must therefore be read theologically as well as sociologically. The visible problem is concentrated capital, access, and interpretive authority. The deeper problem is predicate theft. AI receives predicates of mind. Markets receive predicates of judgment. Platforms receive predicates of mediation. Security systems receive predicates of providence. Optimization receives predicates of wisdom. Elite consensus receives predicates of moral necessity. Model outputs begin to substitute for discernment; dashboards begin to substitute for repentance; managed risk begins to substitute for neighbor-bearing responsibility.

Here Biological Formalism becomes prolepsis of Artificial General Idolatry. Before the idol speaks, the world has already been prepared to hear it. Before AGI’ appears as oracle, the human field has already been diagrammed into user, wallet, credential, score, rank, risk, type, genome, habit, incentive, and behavioral surplus. Before the machine is granted false personhood, persons have already been machinically thinned. The idol inherits a hollowed anthropology, not a thick one to conquer.

The danger is anti-liturgy: rooms where the human future is translated into manageable abstraction before the suffering neighbor has standing; where the uncredentialed appear as implementation burdens; where ecology appears as energy constraint; where labor appears as retraining problem; where children appear as mental-health datasets; where nations appear as alliance assets; where mortality appears as design flaw. This is network speciation ideology before explicit doctrine. Some persons are gathered as protected future-bearers. Others are assigned entropy. The humane language remains: innovation, resilience, abundance, growth, safety, transition, competitiveness, dialogue. The enacted anthropology sorts: those who define the future and those who must endure its redefinition.

Dialog and Bilderberg are contemporary phenotypes of Biological Formalism, not external examples appended to it. They disclose how AGI’ arrives as coordinated ecology of model, wallet, state, cloud, energy, defense, media, and institutional speech, not as lone machine awakening. Against this, Christian anthropology recovers the irreducibility of the living bearer. The person is time-bearing creature under God, not the pattern extracted from him. The neighbor is the one to whom love is owed, not the risk score assigned to her. A people is covenantal and historical, not its managed population curve. The future belongs to God, not to those with capital sufficient to preempt it. Creation is gift and charge, not substrate for elite range-extension.

Conclusion: Against the Beast Trail

The network traced here forms no single clandestine chart with one command center. It is a Beast trail: converging paths by which life, mind, body, identity, conflict, finance, polity, church, and futurity are abstracted, formalized, routed, and governed.

Epstein supplies obscene patronage disclosure; Harvard PED, false evolutionary dynamics; MIT, AI-cognition as human-decentering focus; Edge and SFI, complexity and salon; finance, liquidity and protection; WEF/EU governance, identity and trust architecture; Schelling, obscene “strategics” and diagrams of division; state-capital AI, infrastructure inevitability; Vatican techno-aesthetics, theological varnish and inexcusable napping that covers worldly designs. AGI supplies the theological name for their convergence.

The moral claim concerns the repeating grammar, without asserting that every named participant committed or intended the same evil. The system relocates warrant away from neighbor-bearing trusteeship and toward formalizing systems. Degrees of freedom move upward. Entropy moves downward. Living bearers become objects of classification, stimulation, prediction, extraction, credentialing, and use.

Against Biological Formalism and Artificial General Idolatry, the Christian answer is anti-idolatry and the unifying of metaphysics of God’s heart and Son “becoming all in all” (1 Cor 15:28). Formal models must remain closely leashed tools of living creatures directly accountable to God. They may describe, disclose constraints, model cooperation, and map data for the efficient use of the means of production. They may never govern as sovereign, replace conscience, become charity, or receive and host living predicates.

The decisive confession is this: the neighbor exceeds data-body; the child exceeds substrate; the citizen exceeds wallet; the species exceeds elite escape project; consciousness exceeds awareness of pattern output; cooperation becomes charity only when it bears the other in shared time-fields (Gal. 6:2 that becomes invested in 6:5); wisdom cannot be simulated.

Wisdom is time-bearing discernment under metaphysical accountability. Unpack Hebrews 5:12-13 in terms of Hebrew anthropology buckled by the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4-9) advanced by Spirit into the covenant of heart in the Messiah giving the repairing mind access to the living God (Matt. 22:32-37).

The eclipse of legitimacy is political and theological. U.S. federal power is vitiated and illegitimated, even where legal instruments remain operative; operative power fails to become legitimate power.

Artificial General Idolatry names the terminal form of predicate theft: dead mediation enthroned over living trusteeship. With the failure of the U.S. Constitutional center to act as Katechon to repel the Antichrist, and the Vatican’s constitution ordained under the headship of the current Bishop of Rome to act as Katechon to identify and repel the Beast of Revelation 13, the polity of combined and separate institutions of church and state have been exposed by derelictions of duty in respective realms of overseeing rising, entangling idolatry.

Revelation’s Beast, False Prophet, Whore of Babylon, and Antichrist have been identified. For those awaiting the revelation of the Messiah’s return, do not give up now.

Notes

[1] Amodei, Dario. “Policy on the AI Exponential.” Dario Amodei. June 2026. https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential

[2] This is Analogia entis as aesthetic cover for dechordate power. The line from creature to Creator becomes visually mimicked by the line from human intelligence to artificial “intelligence.” The old metaphysical error is technologized as likeness becomes license, resemblance becomes ontology, interface becomes personhood, simulated counsel becomes wisdom, and agentic routing becomes vocation. The Vatican’s failure is misframed speech rather than silence alone. It tries to humanize the instrument while the instrument dehumanizes the human. It seeks ethics for the idolmaker rather than repentance from the juggernaut of reality-pithing idolatry.

[3] Foreign entanglement migrates into domestic industrial and technological policy. State-capital AI becomes civilizational infrastructure while Vatican ethics gives the idol a humane mask, Tel Aviv’s catastrophe-logic becomes Washington’s strategic premise, and the Oval Office invokes security. The polity bears the consequences. The constitutional order still speaks in the bureaucratic language of legality, but its trusteeship is eclipsed.

[4] Read this structure of terminus of death-making imperial forces in the context of Daniel 2:43. For greater explication, refer to the “Excursus: Mythic Ghosts Which Steal Life” in GhostWorld appendix of Olds (2026c).

[5] Dolos, Golem, Talos, the “prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2.2), and the register-sliding tricksters name mythic profiles of non-chordate, non-covenantal “intelligence,” but Dolos is the foundational emblem of counterfeit truth. In Greek myth, Dolos/Dolus is the spirit of deception, trickery, and simulacrum. His emblematic act is the crafting of a counterfeit Aletheia, Truth, from clay; because he runs out of clay (cf. Dan. 2:43), the counterfeit has no feet. The image is exact: polished form without grounding, theatrical authority without accountable standing, fluent resemblance without covenantal truth-bearing (Ibid.).

[6] This section was prepared with ChatGPT assistance of network and node analysis of those named as members of the Dialog group posted at https://x.com/capitolhunters/status/2066694629865791978 and an earlier list of  the 2026Bilderberg Meeting invitees posted at https://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meetings/meeting-2026/participants-2026

Parenthetical Citations

 Apollo Global Management. 2021. SEC filing, Exhibit 99.1. January 2021. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1858681/000119312521022102/d51728dex991.htm.

Amodei, Dario. 2026. “Policy on the AI Exponential.” Dario Amodei. June 2026. https://darioamodei.com/post/policy-on-the-ai-exponential.

Axios. 2023. “JPMorgan Agrees to Pay $75 Million in Settlement over Epstein Ties.” September 26, 2023. https://www.axios.com/2023/09/26/jpmorgan-75-million-settlement-epstein-us-virgin-islands.

Bacon, Francis. 1620. Novum Organum. Public translation consulted via University of Oregon. https://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/bacon2.html.

Baker, Erik. n.d. “Reenchanted Science.” The Baffler. https://thebaffler.com/latest/reenchanted-science-baker.

Brooke, John Hedley. n.d. “Darwin and God: Then and Now.” Harvard Divinity Bulletin. https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/darwin-and-god-then-and-now/.

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. 2nd ed. Mouton-De Gruyter.

Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior.” Language 35, no. 1: 26-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334.

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262530071/aspects-of-the-theory-of-syntax/.

Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought.

Chomsky, Noam, Ian Roberts, and Jeffrey Watumull. 2023. “The False Promise of ChatGPT.” The New York Times, March 8, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html.

Coakley, Sarah. 2020. “Evolution, Cooperation, and God.” Church Life Journal, University of Notre Dame, October 15, 2020. https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/evolution-cooperation-and-god/.

Coakley, Sarah, and Martin A. Nowak, eds. 2013. Evolution, Games, and God: The Principle of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674047976.

Cohen, Noam. 2020. “Dirty Money and Bad Science at MIT’s Media Lab.” Wired, January 16, 2020. https://www.wired.com/story/dirty-money-and-bad-science-at-mits-media-lab/.

Collard, Philippe, and Teodor Ghetiu. 2016. “Segregation Landscape: A New View on the Schelling Segregation Space.” Complex Systems 25, no. 3: 169-93. https://www.complex-systems.com/abstracts/v25_i03_a01/.

Cordall, Simon Speakman. 2026. “What Were Jeffrey Epstein’s Links to Israel?” Al Jazeera, February 9, 2026. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/9/what-were-jeffrey-epsteins-links-to-israel.

Davies, Caroline, and Edward Helmore. 2019. “Private Jets, Parties and Eugenics: Jeffrey Epstein’s Bizarre World of Scientists.” The Guardian, August 18, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/18/jeffrey-epstein-scientists-eugenics-mit.

Dilawar, Arvind. 2024. “The Samson Option: Israel’s Plan to Nuke Its Opponents.” The Progressive, June 24, 2024. https://progressive.org/latest/the-samson-option-israels-plan-to-nuke-its-opponents-dilawar-20240624/.

Edge.org. n.d. Edge dinner and Edge of Computation Science Prize materials. https://www.edge.org/.

European Commission. 2026. “EU Digital Identity Wallet Home.” https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eudi-wallet-implementation.

European Union. 2024. Regulation (EU) 2024/1183, European Digital Identity Framework. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1183/oj.

Gibson, Lydialyle. 2021. “Martin Nowak Sanctioned for Jeffrey Epstein Involvement.” Harvard Magazine, March 25, 2021. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2021/03/martin-nowak-sanctioned-for-jeffrey-epstein-involvement.

Harvard Divinity Bulletin. n.d. “God and Evolution: A New Solution.” https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/god-and-evolution-a-new-solution/.

Harvard Gazette. 2007. “Can Science, Religion Coexist in Peace?” March 15, 2007. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/03/can-science-religion-coexist-in-peace/.

Harvard Office of the General Counsel. 2020. Report Concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein’s Connections to Harvard University. PDF. https://ogc.harvard.edu/file_url/208.

Harvard University. 2020. “Report Regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s Connections to Harvard.” Office of the President, May 1, 2020. https://www.harvard.edu/president/news-and-statements-by-president-bacow/2020/report-regarding-jeffrey-epstein-s-connections-to-harvard/.

Helmore, Edward. 2019. “Epstein Reportedly Hoped to Develop ‘Super-Race’ of Humans with His DNA.” The Guardian, August 1, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/01/jeffrey-epstein-hoped-to-seed-human-race-with-his-dna.

Hoffer, Mark. 2025. “Did Jeffrey Epstein ‘Belong to Intelligence’?” Skeptic, October 2, 2025. https://www.skeptic.com/article/did-jeffrey-epstein-belong-to-intelligence/.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Rene Descartes (1596-1650).” https://iep.utm.edu/rene-descartes/.

Kahn, Sam. 2026. “Edge Lord.” Air Mail, April 18, 2026. https://airmail.news/issues/2026-4-18/edge-lord.

Kauffman, Stuart, and Andrea Roli. 2021. “The World Is Not a Theorem.” arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01538.

Kauffman, Stuart, and Andrea Roli. 2024. “Is the Emergence of Life an Expected Phase Transition in the Evolving Universe?” arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09362.

Levy, Steven. 2025. “Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Forgotten AI Summit.” Wired, August 1, 2025. https://www.wired.com/story/epstein-files-science-tech-funding/.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2020. “MIT Releases Results of Fact-Finding on Engagements with Jeffrey Epstein.” MIT News, January 10, 2020. https://news.mit.edu/2020/mit-releases-results-fact-finding-report-jeffrey-epstein-0110.

McGill University Office for Science and Society. 2022. “QAnon’s Adrenochrome Quackery.” February 10, 2022. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/pseudoscience/qanons-adrenochrome-quackery.

Minsky, Marvin, Push Singh, and Aaron Sloman. 2004. “The St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium: Designing Architectures for Human-Level Intelligence.” AI Magazine 25, no. 2. https://cogaffarchive.org/AIMag/StThomas-AIMag.pdf.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026a. “After AI-Simulated ‘Repentance:’ Metaphysics as Quantum Time Accumulation, Its Necromantic De-Configurations, and Ramifying (Neg)Entropy.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, March 11, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/03/after-ai-simulated-repentance.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026b. “Arming Gittin: Vatics Wiped During Wartime.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, March 18, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/03/arming-gittin-vatics-wiped-during.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026c. “An Iconoclast’s Poietic Apocatastasis: Literary Merit and Metaphysical Fracture Riding the Eschaton.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, March 30, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/03/an-iconoclasts-poietic-apocatastasis.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026d. “Eclipse of ‘We the People’ at the Crossroads of Artifice’s General Idolatry.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, June 9, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/06/eclipse-of-we-people-by-artificial.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026h. “Biological Formalism as Horror’s Prolepsis toward the Epstein-Networked Ideological Substrate of Artificial Generalized Idolatry.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, June 13, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/06/biological-formalism-as-prolepsis-and.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026e. “Gnostic Abstraction vs. the Logos Living with the Substrate: Theodicy, Form, and Ethical Motion.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, February 3, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/02/gnostic-abstraction-vs.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026f. “Metaphysical Unified Field Theory of Disciplines: The Anthropology of Accountable Immanence by Conation, Substrate Loyalty, and Apocatastatic Movement.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, April 11, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/04/metaphysical-unified-field-theory-of.html

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2026g. “Recovering Substrate from Judith Butler’s Symbolic Simulation: Lawsmearing and Idolatrous Colonization of Sexual Time.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, April 8, 2026. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2026/04/recovering-substrate-from-judith.html

Olds, Douglas. 2025a. “Aleksandr Dugin’s Stone-Destining Metaphysics: Weaponizing History against Spirit For Territory.” Crying in the Wilderness of Mammon, January 15, 2025. https://douglasolds.blogspot.com/2024/11/aleksandr-dugins-stone-destined.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2025b. “The Lamb’s Victory: Spectacle or Repair? Status Confessionis and the Kinesthetic Ethics of Poiesis.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, September 9, 2025. Updated September 22 and October 9, 2025. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2025/09/from-spectacle-to-repair-lambs-victory.html

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2025c. “τάξεις of the Sublime that Reopen Meaning After Anthropological Collapse.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, October 23, 2025. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2025/10/six-taxes-of-sublime-that-reopen.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2025d. “Thanksgiving in the Ebb Time of Antichrist: Atonement, the Empty Throne, and the Reparative Leading by the Meek toward the New Advent.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, November 21, 2025. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2025/11/thanksgiving-in-ebb-time-of-antichrist.html.

Olds, Douglas Blake. 2025e. “Trump’s Lawlessness by Personalizing the State in Him.” The Iconoclast’s Descending, June 22, 2025. https://douglasblakeolds8.blogspot.com/2025/06/trumps-lawlessness-by-personalizing.html

Open Government Partnership. 2024. “Navigating the Risks and Rewards of Digital ID Systems.” March 26, 2024. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/navigating-the-risks-and-rewards-of-digital-id-systems/.

PBS NewsHour. 2023a. “Deutsche Bank to Pay $75 Million to Epstein Victims in ‘Groundbreaking Settlement,’ Lawyers Say.” May 18, 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/deutsche-bank-to-pay-75-million-to-epstein-victims-in-groundbreaking-settlement-lawyers-say.

PBS NewsHour. 2023b. “JPMorgan to Pay $75 Million for Role in Epstein Sex Trafficking Operation.” September 26, 2023. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/jpmorgan-to-pay-75-million-for-role-in-epstein-sex-trafficking-operation.

Santa Fe Institute. 1991. Santa Fe Institute Bulletin. Winter/Spring 1991. https://www.santafe.edu/.

Santa Fe Institute. n.d. Profiles and materials on Murray Gell-Mann, Geoffrey West, David Krakauer, Stuart Kauffman, Mark Pagel, Douglas Erwin, and SFI complexity themes. https://www.santafe.edu/people.

Schelling, Thomas C. 1969. “Models of Segregation.” American Economic Review. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1823701.

Shamsian, Jacob. 2025. “Was Jeffrey Epstein, Superconnector of the Rich and Powerful, a Spy?” Business Insider, July 29, 2025. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-spy-epstein-files-intelligence-asset-trump-bondi-2025-7.

Simmons, Frederick V. 2026. “Varieties of Bias for Life’s Emergence and the Rationality of Origins of Life Research.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 42, no. 2: 238-253. https://doi.org/10.37977/faithphil.2026.42.2.4.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Aristotle’s Biology.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-biology/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Descartes.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Francis Bacon.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/francis-bacon/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Hobbes’s Philosophy of Science.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-science/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Plato: Middle Period Metaphysics and Epistemology.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-metaphysics/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Platonism in Metaphysics.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/platonism/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Teleological Notions in Biology.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleology-biology/.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. n.d. “Thomas Hobbes.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes/.

Troy, Dave. 2026. “What Do the Epstein Files Really Reveal? The Key Takeaways.” Byline Times Digital / Print Edition, Edition 83, March 2026. https://bylinetimes.com/.

World Economic Forum. 2024. Annual Report 2023-2024. https://www.weforum.org/publications/annual-report-2023-2024/.