The Red Herring of "AI Plagiarism" and the Metaphysical Confusion of Machine Authorship Douglas Blake Olds May 20, 2026 The contemporary charge of “AI plagiarism” rests upon an unexamined contradiction. To accuse a user of plagiarism because AI was employed as a tool tacitly assumes that the tool itself possesses an independent creative existence. The accusation quietly grants the machine a status usually denied to it elsewhere: authorship, origination, intentionality, or proprietary relation to what it produces. Yet neural-statistical LLM systems embedded in symbolic and algorithmic infrastructures do not output from inward recollection, existential risk, accountable memory, or lived duration. They compress, route, and recombine patterns extracted from human language, art, thought, and archive. This becomes clearer when considering the legal and institutional posture surrounding chatbot systems themselves. Such systems are often presented as operating upon open, public...
Posts
Showing posts from May, 2026