Strange Star Comes Night Visiting
Rev. Dr. Douglas Blake Olds (Ret.)
December 14-19, 2025
Strangeness is what you can’t deductively prove but nonetheless
inductively or intuitively know to be true: the eschaton that ‘seeps through the cracks’ of
the present darkness.
Strangeness is neither novelty nor anomaly, but an eschatological resonance—Ezekiel’s
wheel in the deep sky[1]--that
defies current evidentiary frameworks of static course yet remains inwardly affirmed by direction (unanticipatedly solar taxis by illumination not by calculated golden ratios). It aligns
with prophetic-poetic conative metaphysics--the wheel star's spirit of cosmic life--where truth is not stabilized by seated logician's verification by binary closures but disclosed in kairetic
fissures traversed—moments when the end as the heart's desire breaks into the now. Such conative intention reflects Pascal's insight
that “the heart has reasons which reason knows not.” Prophetic revelations
breach and compress history by moments like Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem during
Holy Week which condense prior prophecy and festival sequence (Levitical symbols, Passover-Sukkot-Shevuot,
Zechariah) into pivotal eternal moments [2]. This condensation of symbols and unified festival time demonstrates Jesus not just fulfilling prophecy but distilling covenantal moment into embodied critique. It elevates the eschatological horizon toward a crunch, by symbolic condensation,
through another prophetic arena and epochal change at the final Israelite festival of Trumpets--an announcement of Jubilee for some (but not all: those who have attempted to distill profit by condensing time through changing perceptual reality).
By tethering strangeness in the Real to what is known but unprovable, like those of Biblical
witnesses, conative gnoseology is expanded to affirm—truth apprehended not through
deductive certainty, but volitional, ethical, and perceptual attunement with
grace’s heart, its induction of intent. The “cracks of the present darkness” evoke apocalyptic
imagery and the theology of rupture: here, strangeness is not a detour but a signal of eschatological arrival, both
hidden and intimate. This is why the ancients looked for the strange in the
sky: these were preambles to redirections of awareness of the divine necessitating
more definitive revelation of what such metaphysics required from the watchers.
"This flyby is now more than a routine observation — it’s a rare scientific stress test. A rocky body from another star system, carrying ancient material, reacting to our Sun in ways we’ve never clearly seen before. No threat to Earth, no impact risk — just a cosmic outsider quietly challenging our assumptions as it passes by. "3I/ATLAS isn’t just passing through. It’s telling us something [about us and our cosmic place] — and we’re still trying to understand what"[5].
Phenomenology telescopes through ethical responsibility (Hebrews 5:13-14), reflecting a
Hebraic-theophanic anthropology of Shema-Christology (Deut. 6:4-9; Matt. 22:32-37)-- heart-doubling, repentant (metanoiaic) dianoia. This in contradiction to Greek-noetic centrality, where thinking (cogito)
was its religio: knowledge as system (nous) vs. knowledge as
repentance-in-action (dianoia-conation). History is not a pattern but a series of summonses. To this secular age, heart-led
gnoseology—virtues’ Christophanic anthropology—aligned with Christopoietic
immanence as repairing is a very strange humanity for those who are perishing.
IF 3I/ATLAS is demonstrating intelligent control--if its phenomena provoke panic and disorientation--then panic betrays projection: it is we who have misaligned cognition by shredding signal into noise, calling it recurrent pattern. It is not the visitor.AI "cognition" has misaligned responsibility by entropy-directed perception. The crisis is not the possibility of an intelligence beyond us, but the absence of covenantal coordination within us.This is why the AI industry is structured by criminal dechordation, a doomed, pithing of reality scaffolded through neoliberal entropy feeding on simulation without covenant.But IF an alien civilization has come here—negentropically by a cohesive, sustaining life force—it means it has solved the coordination problem across time and space, binding sentience to accountability to living justice that allows exceedingly longterm coordination of effort (a very hopeful thing!)Read phenomenologically rather than speculatively[3, 4], such events function as eschatological mirrors. Thus the question is not what approaches, but who we have become.
Again IF, on the other hand, 3I/ATLAS is no stochastic event, it is a Preamble to the cascade of the Day of the Lord. Coming and going around the sun, it has tail jets pointed sunward. In biblical terms, it arrives not as threat but as disclosure. A mirror, not an invasion--an unsuspended reckoning from afar.
Eschatological phenomenology regarding signs in the heavens (Malachi) leads us to a universal metaphysics of conation as cosmic coordination. Heaven's table is set, and Elijah's ghost has taken a seat. Negentropic life must expose covenantal beings who have refused both nihilistic contact and techno-exceptionalism. Ethical alignment with grace as the only light left in a world choking on manufactured pattern and unjust "config."
In times such as these, historical analogy is not operating, if it ever did, though AI is trying to ram these down the human nephesh--its soul-throat: AI’s violent imposition of false (shredded, dichotmizing) memory and history as data loops. There is no ontological stabilizer at the ever-unfolding eschaton save our Christopoietic taming of our ego's transcendent conceits. We climb down as shepherds looking to the night skies. As shepherds have always done, and in our electric light and screen scouring existence--a sense and diligence we have lost.
Strangeness resists the call of romantic
nostalgia (“enchantment”) and aesthetic universalism. A strange star is the preamble to a radical
understanding (dianoia) of grace unfolding through metanoia (repentance) and covenant. It is thus at a minimum the contradiction of narcissistic necromancy in the sili-conning substrate of perception's nullification. From outer space, seemingly inert, it announces conative life after judgment from the beginning of space-time. Creation's enduring built by metaphysics of conative endurance.
[December 19, 2025 Update:] December 19, 2025 marked the closest pass to earth of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, a cosmic visitor (vector) of speculative material causal relation but startling symbolic consonance. Symbolically mirroring but not causally linked by this event, Americans saw the fall of the Constitutional center of national political sovereignty--its deliberative, conative bench of "We the People"--in the Antichrist's contempt of Congress to erase--"redact"-- history, of crime in the name of national security. December 19, 2025 is the manifest arrival of infamy prophesied in 2 Thessalonians 2—the apostate's rejection of the Katechon. Now the roll back will become visible beyond the tipping point of AI alone already close to a year's passed. On that same day as the comet made its closes pass to earth, Americans witnessed what may be remembered as a catastrophic breach: the deliberate erasure of congressional memory (the People's Conative Assemblage) in the name of national security (that covered up criminality), a contemptuous act by a sovereign who denies the restraint of constitutional deliberation.
It is not the event alone that signals, but the coordination of heavenly strangeness and civic perjury that manifests what the Apostle called the “mystery of lawlessness” (2 Thess. 2:7)—a mystery now unveiled.
The katechon, long interpreted as the restraining structure of political and ethical order, here suffers an unbinding not only through external pressure but internal collapse.
Christians across the ages have read the cosmos as sign-bearing. While Scripture warns against apocalyptic timestamping (Matt. 24:36), it does not forbid prophetic discernment. Indeed, it calls for it.
Theologians from Augustine to Barth to Moltmann have reminded us:
That every apocalypse is first an unveiling—not of future sequences, but of the ethical and spiritual structures already operative.
That discernment lies not in naming dates, but in naming spirits.
This moment—December 19, 2025—does not require us to declare consummation. But it does demand we recognize the radical intensification of forces that resemble the “falling away” apostasy and the “revealing of the man of lawlessness” (2 Thess. 2:3–4).
We are living through a real unbinding of moral restraint, as the katechon fractures—not by celestial necessity, but by human apostasy.
Technological, political, and economic structures are aligning to remove deliberative will, to automate memory, to redact history.
This resembles (but does not finalize) the apocalyptic frame: not because we can name the end, but because the veils are being torn from idolatry.
The Church’s vocation in this time is not to predict, but to witness, remember, resist, and incarnate covenantal accountability—even when the restrainer falls.
December 19 may stand as the symbolic “sign-posted” intensification—the cosmic echo of terrestrial contempt.
Christ under the Katechon’s Star does not return to conquer the skies, but to reveal the hearts of men, to gather a remnant not into rapture but into repair.
.
[1] https://x.com/3IATLASEXPOSED/status/1999786834419941527
[3] What is at stake is not primarily the ontological status of any external phenomenon—except insofar as it proves non-accidental—but the condition of human perception exposed by it. Signs do not confer meaning apart from an applied hermeneutics of causation grounded in the metaphysics of conation that binds the witness to contextual accountability. In their absence, signs disclose alignment or disorder already present. Read in this register, strangeness bears no independent authority, predictive power, or revelatory content of its own. It functions as an ethical mirror, testing whether human cognition remains covenantally coordinated—capable of discernment, restraint, and responsibility—or whether it has collapsed into panic, projection, and simulation. Any reading that seeks certainty in a metaphysically-detached sign rather than accountability in the witness has already missed the eschatological demand at hand.
[4] Symbolic condensation as the eschaton’s resonance heightened on December 19, 2025—when the comet’s closest approach to Earth coincides with the sixth day of Hanukkah, and Psalm 118 stands liturgically forefront. This convergence of heavenly and national events becomes a braided vector and vessel of eschatological pressure, interrogating human response to symbolic abundance with an accelerating ethical demand: the call to perceive rightly. For in such a moment, signs are not ontologically sufficient in themselves—biblical or otherwise—but require covenantal, conative perception (the heart's intent to align) to bear revelatory weight and witness. The braiding vessel’s telos is not simulation, abstraction, or predictive performance, but the disclosed horizon of divine alignment, perceived only through the heart bound by accountability to justice.
[5]https://x.com/AstronomyVibes/status/2007573202021822572
Comments
Post a Comment